NPWT standardization to single vendor
AC-2026-002Value reviewStandard Review· Wound Care· Owner: Sarah Okafor· Target decision: Feb 10, 2026
Problem
Three NPWT vendors in-house: triple inventory, inconsistent training, premium rental pricing on two contracts, and avoidable dressing-change frequency on legacy systems.
Current standard
Mixed fleet across three NPWT vendors (rental + consumables).
Technology
Negative-pressure wound therapy — single-vendor consolidation
Vendor
WoundTech Pro
Requested by
Jenna Kowalski, NP — Nurse Practitioner, Wound Care
Submitted
Nov 18, 2025
Reasons
Standardization · Cost reduction · Workflow improvement
Urgency
routine
Est. patients affected / yr
640
Network-connected
No
Replaces existing product
Yes
Triage assessment
| Dimension | Weight | Score /5 |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical impact Equivalent therapy; fewer changes on modern platform | 30% | 3 |
| Safety No change to risk profile | 25% | 2 |
| Financial materiality $486K category spend | 20% | 4 |
| Workflow disruption Retraining across 3 units | 15% | 3 |
| Organizational risk Established technology | 10% | 2 |
Weighted triage score57 / 100
Classic standardization case with measurable spend and workflow deltas.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders are assigned at triage.